WHO WAS REALLY FLYING
THOSE PLANES ON 9-11?
Hours after the 9-11 attacks, authorities began to find clues
conveniently left for them to stumble upon. The Boston Globe
reported that a copy of the Koran, instructions on how to fly a
commercial airplane and a fuel consumption calculator were found
in a pair of bags meant for one of the hijacked flights that left
from Logan. 64
Authorities also received a "tip" about a suspicious
white car left behind at Boston's Logan Airport. An
Arabic-language flight training manual was found inside the car. 65
How fortunate for investigators that the hijackers
"forgot" to take their Koran and Arab flight manuals
with them! Within a few days, all "19 hijackers"
were "identified" and their faces were plastered all
over our television screens.
Then, like a script from a corny "B" spy movie, the
official story gets even more ridiculous. The passport of the
supposed "ringleader" Mohammed Atta, somehow managed to
survive the explosion, inferno, and smoldering collapse to be
oh-so-conveniently "found" just a few blocks away from
the World Trade Center! 66
It is obvious that this "evidence" was planted by
individuals wishing to direct the blame towards Osama Bin Laden.
How is it possible that Arab students who had never flown an
airplane could take a simulator course and then fly jumbo jets
with the skill and precision of "top-gun" pilots? It is
not possible and the fact is, the true identities of the 9-11
hijackers remains a mystery. In the days following the disclosure
of the "hijackers" names and faces, no less than 7 of
the Arab individuals named came forward to protest their obvious
innocence. 67
That's right! Seven of the nineteen
"hijackers" are alive and well. They were
victims of identity theft, some of whom had had their passports
stolen. They were interviewed by several news organizations
including the Telegraph of England. Heres an excerpt from
David Harrisons Telegraph story entitled: Revealed: The
Men With Stolen Identities:
"Their names were flashed around the world as suicide
hijackers who carried out the attacks on America. But yesterday
four innocent men told how their identities had been stolen
The men - all from Saudi Arabia - spoke of their shock at being
mistakenly named by the FBI as suicide terrorists. None of the
four was in the United States on September 11 and all are alive
in their home country."
The Telegraph obtained the first interviews with the men since
they learnt that they were on the FBI's list of hijackers who
died in the crashes in New York, Washington and Pennsylvania.
All four said that they were "outraged" to be
identified as terrorists. One has never been to America and
another is a Saudi Airlines pilot who was on a training course in
Tunisia at the time of the attacks. Saudi Airlines said it was
considering legal action against the FBI for seriously damaging
its reputation and that of its pilots." 68
(emphasis added)
The story of these identity thefts was also briefly reported by
ABC 69 and BBC (England) 70 The FBI does not deny
this. Nobody denies this fact because it is easily verifiable.
Instead, the US media and government just ignore this
inconvenient little fact and keep right on repeating the
monstrous lie that the hijacker identities are known and that 15
of them were Saudis.
CNN revealed that FBI director Robert Mueller openly admitted
that some of the identities of the 9-11 hijackers are in question
due to identity theft. Heres what CNN reported on September
21:
FBI Director Robert Mueller has acknowledged that some of those
behind last week's terror attacks may have stolen the
identification of other people, and, according to at least one
security expert, it may have been "relatively easy"
based on their level of sophistication. 71
This opens up a whole Pandoras box of unanswered questions.
First and foremost of which is this: why would Osama Bin laden,
the Saudi Arabian caveman, steal identities? To cover his tracks
you say? Next question: why would a Saudi Arabian, attempting to
cover his tracks, steal the identities of....fellow Saudi
Arabians??? What would be the point? Why go you through the
trouble of stealing identities that would point back to you? Why
not steal Greek identities, or Brazilian identities, or Turkish
ones? A much more logical conclusion is that non-Arabs stole
these identities as part of a "false flag" operation
designed to point the blame at Arabs, and Saudi Arabs in
particular.
What kind of a corrupt character is FBI boss Mueller? He
initially admitted that false identities were involved with 9-11,
but then he allows the media to keep naming these innocent, and
alive, Arabs as the hijackers? Why doesnt he correct them?
More on the slimy Mr. Mueller later on!
Now I'm really going to rock your faith in the false religion of
9-11. In February of 2000, Indian intelligence officials detained
11 members of what they thought was an Al Qaeda hijacking
conspiracy. It was then discovered that these 11 "Muslim
preachers" were all Israeli nationals! Indias leading
weekly magazine, The Week, reported:
"On January 12 Indian intelligence officials in Calcutta
detained 11 foreign nationals for interrogation before they were
to board a Dhaka-bound Bangladesh Biman flight. They were
detained on the suspicion of being hijackers. "But we
realized that they were tabliqis (Islamic preachers), so we let
them go, said an Intelligence official."
The eleven had Israeli passports but were believed to be Afghan
nationals who had spent a while in Iran.
Indian
intelligence officials, too, were surprised by the nationality
profile of the eleven. "They say that they have been on
tabligh (preaching Islam) in India for two months. But they are
Israeli nationals from the West Bank," said a Central
Intelligence official. He claimed that Tel Aviv
"exerted considerable pressure" on Delhi to secure
their release. "It appeared that they could
be working for a sensitive organization in Israel and were on a
mission to Bangladesh," the official said." 72 (emphasis added)
What were these 11 Israelis doing trying to impersonate Al Qaeda
men? Infiltrating?...perhaps. Framing?...more likely. But the
important precedent to understand is this: Israeli agents were
once caught red handed impersonating Muslim hijackers!
This event becomes even more mind boggling when we learn that it
was Indian Intelligence that helped the US to so quickly identify
the "19 hijackers"! On April 3, 2002, Express India,
quoting the Press Trust of India, revealed:
Washington, April 3: Indian intelligence agencies helped the
US to identify the hijackers who carried out the deadly September
11 terrorist attacks in New York and Washington, a media report
said here on Wednesday. 73
Ain't that a kick in the ass?!! Did you catch that? The
Indian intelligence officials that were duped into mistaking
Israeli agents for Al Qaeda hijackers back in 2000- were
the very same clowns telling the FBI who it was that hijacked the
9-11 planes! Keep in mind that Indian intelligence has an extremely
close working relationship with Israels Mossad because
both governments hate the Muslim nation of Pakistan. 74
Now about Mohamed Atta, you know, the so-called "ring
leader". There are a number of inconsistencies with that
story as well. Like some of the 7 hijackers known to be still
alive, Atta also had his passport stolen in 1999, 75 (the same passport that
miraculously survived the WTC explosion and collapse?) making
him an easy mark for an identity theft. Atta was known to all as
a shy, timid, and sheltered young man who was uncomfortable with
women. 76 The 5'7" 150
pound architecture student was such a "goody two shoes"
that some of his university acquaintances in Germany refrained
from drinking or cursing in front of him. How this gentle, non-
political mamma's boy from a good Egyptian family suddenly
transformed himself into the vodka drinking, go-go girl groping
terrorist animal described by the media, has to rank as the
greatest personality change since another classic work of
fiction, Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde.
Atta, or someone using Atta's identity, had enrolled in a Florida
flight school in 2001 and then broke off his training, making
it a point to tell his instructor he was leaving for Boston. In
an October 2001 interview with an ABC affiliate in Florida,
flight school president Rudi Dekkers said that his course does
not qualify pilots to fly commercial jumbo jets. 77 He also described Atta as
"an asshole". 78 Part of the reason
for Dekker's dislike for Atta stems from a highly unusual
incident that occurred at the beginning of the course.
Heres the exchange between ABC producer Quentin McDermott
and Dekkers:
MCDERMOTT: "Why do you say Atta was an asshole?"
DEKKERS: "Well, when Atta was here and I saw his face on
several occasions in the building, then I know that they're
regular students and then I try to talk to them, it's kind of a
PR - where are you from
I tried to communicate with him. I
found out from my people that he lived in Hamburg and he spoke
German so one of the days that I saw him, I speak German myself,
I'm a Dutch citizen, and I started in the morning telling him in
German, "Good morning. How are you? How do you like the
coffee? Are you happy here?", and he looked at me with cold
eyes, didn't react at all and walked away. That was one of my
first meetings I had." 79
This is eerily similar to the way in which Zacharias Moussaoui
(the so-called "20th hijacker) became
"belligerent" when his Minnesota flight instructor
tried to speak to him in French (his first language), at the
beginning of that course. The Minnessota Star Tribune reported on
December 21, 2001:
"Moussaoui first raised eyebrows when, during a simple
introductory exchange, he said he was from France, but
then didn't seem to understand when the instructor spoke French
to him. Moussaoui then became belligerent and evasive
about his background, (Congressman) Oberstar and other sources
said. In addition, he seemed inept in basic flying procedure,
while seeking expensive training on an advanced commercial jet
simulator." 80
(emphasis added)
It truly is an amazing twist of fate that both Ata and Moussaoui
both had American flight instructors who spoke German and French
respectively. Even the great Mossad could not have foreseen such
a coincidence! The real Atta would have been able to respond to
his instructors German small talk and the real Moussaoui
would have been able to respond to his instructors French
small talk. Ata just walked away and Moussaoui threw a fit!
Neither responded because neither could. They were imposters,
whose faces were probably disguised by a make up artist.
Their mission was to frame the two innocent Arabs who were
probably targeted by the Mossad at random.
The imposter was able to create a new Ata by using Atta's stolen
passport from 1999 - the same passport that floated safely to the
ground with a few burnt edges on 9-11. These strange
inconsistencies tend to give support to Mohammed Atta's father's
claim that he spoke over the phone with his son on September
12th, the day after the attacks. 81 Could a group of
professionals have abducted and killed the real Atta in the days
following the 9-11 attacks? Mossad agents, posing as "art
students" were arrested after conducting some type of
operation in Hollywood, Florida, the same small town that Atta
stayed in! 82 So what happened to the
real Mohammed Atta? To quote his grief stricken father: "Ask
Mossad!".
So who, if not the "19 Arabs" was on those planes?
Thats the million dollar question! There are a number of
alternative scenarios. Could some Israelis have been fanatical
enough to have volunteered for such a suicide mission? Odd as
that may sound at first, it is not out of the realm of
possibility. The fact is, hard-core Zionist extremists have
proven themselves to be every bit as fanatical, (more so),
than Arab extremists.
A nation which can produce thousands of bloodthirsty Zionist
extremists, Irgun war criminals, Mossad terrorists who blow
up occupied buildings, assassins who kill Israeli Prime Ministers
in full view of policemen, and crazed killers who have carried
sickening massacres of Arab women and children; would surely be
capable of recruiting a few fanatics willing to sacrifice
for "the cause". This theory becomes even more
plausible when we consider that only the pilots would have needed
to know that the planes were on a suicide mission.
Still dont think Israel is capable of producing suicidal
terrorists? Have you already forgotten the case of Dr. Baruch
Goldstein?. Goldstein was a New York doctor and resettled
in Israel. On February 25, 1994, Goldstein walked into a crowded
Arab mosque in the occupied West Bank. With hundreds of
worshippers kneeled in silent prayer, Goldstein sealed off the
exit, and opened fire with a rapid-firing assault rifle, killing
29 and wounding many more. Goldstein, a father of four,
was finally stopped and killed when the frenzied crowd
overpowered him. With as many as 800 worshippers packed into the
mosque, Goldstein surely could not have been expecting to come
out alive. This was clearly a suicide attack. And
what did Goldsteins mother have to say about her sons
suicide attack? The Boston Globe revealed:
"The mother of Baruch Goldstein, the Jewish settler who
massacred about 40 Palestinians in a Hebron mosque a week ago,
says she is proud of her son. "I always thought to myself,
'When would someone get up and do such a thing?' And in the end,
my son did it," Miriam Goldstein told the weekly Shishi
newspaper." 83
It gets even more sickening than that. Baruch Goldstein has
become a folk hero among many of the crazed side-locked settlers
who have encroached upon the West Bank. They have turned
Goldsteins gravesite into a memorial and set up a website
to honor his murderous deed! Look what these fanatics posted on
the Goldstein memorial website:
"Over the years, the grave has become a site of
pilgrimage. Numerous people from all over the world come
to pray and honor his (Baruchs) memory. 84
(emphasis added)
One has to wonder if some of Goldsteins admirers were
flying those planes on 9-11. There is one interesting side note
here which may or may not be of any significance. One of the two
Israelis who died aboard the hijacked planes was Daniel Lewin -
who was aboard the first plane to crash into the Twin Towers. The
Haaretz News Service of Israel revealed that Lewin,
was a one-time officer in the Israeli Defense Forces elite
Sayeret Matkal commando unit. 85 Oddly enough, Lewins
name is missing from CNNs comprehensive September 11
Memorial website.
Another possibility is that some other group of
"patsies" was recruited for the operation. Perhaps some
anarchists, or some leftover Marxists who thought they were
going to bring down western capitalism. Or perhaps, the hijackers
were another group of angry Arabs who werent even
aware of who their true handlers really were or what the broader
strategic aim of the mission actually was. In the dark world of
covert operations, agents are often kept ignorant of who it is
that orchestrating the show.
Admittedly, these scenarios are speculative, but one thing that
is not speculative is this: the hijackers were not the
19 men whose faces were shown on our TV screens!
GOLDSTEIN STILL ALIVE: AL SHEHRI AL
OMARI AL-MIDHAR
WHO PROVIDED THE PROTECTIVE COVER FOR THE 9-11 OPERATION?
On October 26, 1999, the famous golfer Payne Stewart boarded a
private Learjet in Florida and left for Texas. Shortly after
takeoff, Stewart's jet veered sharply off course and began
heading northwest. All contact with air controllers was lost.
Within 15 minutes of having gone off course, US fighter jets had
already intercepted the jet. Everyone on board was likely dead
due to depressurization. These fighter jets were dispatched by
NORAD, the branch of the US air force whose job it is to monitor
and defend US airspace 24 hours a day. NORAD maintains a huge
array of land based radar systems and has fighter jets on alert
24 hours a day so that they can respond to a crisis. The jets
escorted the doomed airplane until another group of Air National
Guard jets took over the escort mission. Finally, Stewart's jet
ran out of fuel a crashed in South Dakota. The quick reaction
time and military precision with which NORAD intercepted and
escorted Stewart's jet was impressive, and exactly what one would
have expected from the greatest military power in world history. 86
But on 9-11, the same NORAD which had so effortlessly intercepted
Stewart's jet in 1999, was nowhere to be found during that two
hour period between the first planes going off course and the
last one crashing in a Pennsylvania field. How is it possible
that the airspace between Boston and Washington DC, an area which
contains the political and economic heart of the nation, was left
completely defenseless? The second plane to hit the New York had
flown off course without communication for 40 minutes. On its way
to New York, it actually flew within a few miles of McGuire Air
Force base in New Jersey, after the first tower had already been
hit! And how is it possible that Washington DC was left
undefended (long after the New York attacks) when Andrews Air
Force base is within car driving distance? The air force jets
which did finally arrive were too late. Was this due to NORAD's
incompetence, or was the order to scramble the fighter jets
deliberately delayed so that the terror attacks could take place.
Given NORAD's impressive performance in the 1999 Payne Stewart
disaster, this would suggest that someone high up in the Air
Force establishment may have issued stand down orders to some of
our Air Force bases. Remember, the Pentagon's Defense Policy
Board is headed by Zionist Richard Perle and his gang of
warmongering lackeys. 87 The civilians on this
board wield the power to promote career minded Generals and
Admirals. Is it really that hard to believe that a highly placed
military leader could have collaborated with the true 9-11
planners?
What makes the Air Force's slow response even more outrageous and
suspicious is that previously mentioned Newsweek article which
revealed that several Pentagon leaders (Defense Policy Board?)
cancelled flight plans for September 11 due to security concerns.
88 There were other warning
signals too which were reviewed earlier. In light of all
these warnings, why wasnt NORAD and it's armada of fighters
placed on an even higher alert than they already are? There is
only one logical answer to these questions: Certain Pentagon
leaders were "in on it".
General Hamid Gul, a former Director of Pakistani Intelligence
hit the nail on the head with his analysis:
"The attacks against New York and Washington were Israeli
engineered
"
"The attacks started at 8:45, and four flights are diverted
from their assigned air space and no Air Force fighter jets
scramble until 10:00. Radars are jammed, transponders fail and no
IFF - friend or foe identification - challenge. In Pakistan, if
there is no response to an IFF, jets are instantly scrambled.
This was clearly an inside job. Will this also be hushed up in
the investigation, like the Kennedy assassination?" 89
This raises another troubling set of questions. Surely the
masterminds of the 9-11 operation would
have taken the time to learn something about US air defense
procedures. They would therefore have realized that hitting New
York City with jets hijacked from Boston would have been
difficult. New York is about 30 minutes away by airplane and
jumbo jets fly very slowly when compared to US fighter jets that
can crack the sound barrier. Even with a 15-20 minute head start,
NORAD's jets could have easily intercepted them, especially the
second plane, which took a longer route to New York and flew way
off course for 40 minutes. Why choose Boston's airport and
jeopardize the success of the operation? Wouldn't it be safer to
just hijack planes from New York's Kennedy or La Guardia
Airports? Or even Newark, NJ which is just across the river. Any
plane hijacked from either of those three busy airports would
have been unstoppable. Even a plane from Philadelphia's Airport
would have been much closer to the target than far away Boston.
The planners were no dummies. They must have counted on receiving
protective cover and a window of opportunity by someone high up
at US Air command. Why else choose Boston? In addition to the
protection that the planners were to receive from certain Air
Force elements, there is another plausible theory for choosing
Boston's Logan Airport as well as United and American Airlines
planes. It should be noted that the firm which provides
security at Boston's Logan Airport and also Newark Airport, and
also works extensively with United and American Airlines, is a
company called Huntleigh USA. 90 Claiming that Huntleigh
USA's airport security was grossly negligent on 9-11, family
members of some of the victims are suing Huntleigh. 91 Huntleigh USA had been
acquired by ICTS International in 1999. ICTS is controlled by two
Israelis; Ezra Harel and Menachem Atzmon. 92 In short, security
at Boston's Logan airport was handled (or mishandled) by an
Israeli controlled company. Is there a connection here? Could
agents have been infiltrated into Logan Airport under Israeli
owned Huntleigh's cover? It's quite possible. In the days
following the 9-11 attacks, Israeli security professionals began
aggressively marketing themselves in order to gain more airport
security jobs. 93 Americans should be
grateful to have such wonderful allies who care about our airport
security so much!
Could some of the failure of our defense systems be attributed to
a cyber attack from computer hackers? Our defense and
intelligence systems are very dependent upon technology. A well
coordinated attack on these systems may also have contributed to
our inability to expose and prevent the attacks. There is one
group that has the capability to attack our military computer
systems.
In July of 1999, Haaretz (Israel) ran a story headlined:
"Hackers Using Israeli Net Site to Strike at Pentagon":
Haaretz reported:
"An Israeli Internet site is being used by international
computer hackers as a base for electronic attacks on US
government and military computer systems, according to Pentagon
officials who were quoted in a Washington Timnes report
yesterday."
"According to the Times, the real danger to US national
security is the threat posed by foreign intelligence services or
governments that could launch electronic warfare against the
United States" 94
And look what the US Department of Justice wrote in this 1998
press release:
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- "The Department of Justice, in
conjunction with the FBI, the Air Force Office of Special
Investigation, the National Aeronautic and Space Administration
and the Naval Criminal Investigative Service, announced today
that the Israeli National Police arrested Ehud Tenebaum, an
Israeli citizen, for illegally accessing computers belonging to
the Israeli and United States governments, as well as hundreds of
other commercial and educational systems in the United States and
elsewhere." 95
No doubt about it. Covert elements in Israel have been targeting
the US militarys defense systems for some time now. This
could very well have been yet another instrument played during
the great orchestrated concert of 9-11.
LEFT: GENERAL HAMID GUL: "CLEARLY AN INSIDE JOB."
RIGHT: BUSH: "LET US NEVER TOLERATE OUTRAGEOUS CONSPIRACY
THEORIES."
THE CURIOUS
COLLAPSE OF THE TWIN TOWERS
The government/media approved version of events insists that the
fires in the World Trade Center burned so hot that they
caused steel supports to melt and buckle, thus triggering a
total collapse of the towers. This is a strange theory for a
number of reasons:
1. The architects who designed the World Trade Center designed it
to withstand the direct impact and fuel fire of a commercial
airline crash. Aaron Swirsky, one of the architects of the WTC
described the collapse as "incredible" and "unbelievable."
96
Lee Robertson, the project's structural engineer said: "I
designed it for a 707 to hit it. The Boeing 707 has a fuel
capacity comparable to the 767." 97
2. The history of high-rise building fires provides no case
histories of buildings collapsing due to steel beams melting from
a fire.
3. The collapse of both towers were both perfectly symmetrical
and methodical. The straight down collapse was identical in
appearance to a well engineered, controlled implosion. A
demolition company could not have done it better. Now that we
know that all one has to do to bring a tall building straight
down is set a fuel fire in it, the well trained experts who work
for demolition companies should all be out of a job by now!
Even a layman with no explosives background should be able to see
this. But many specialists in the explosives and structural
engineering have also made this observation and commented on
these inconsistencies. After the WTC collapse, the Vice President
of New Mexico Tech, Van Romero, gave an interview to the
Albuquerque Journal. He stated plainly that he believed that the
WTC collapse was too methodical and that explosive devices
must have been placed in key points of both buildings. Romero
said:
"It would be difficult for something from the plane to
trigger an event like that. It could have been a relatively small
amount of explosives placed in strategic points. One of the
things that terrorists are noted for is a diversionary attack and
a secondary device." 98
In that same interview, Romero revealed that he was in Washington
DC when the attacks took place. He and a colleague were there to
discuss defense research programs for New Mexico Tech. A
few days after his interview, Romero abruptly changed his opinion
and told the Albuquerque Journal that he no longer believed that
bombs brought down the towers. 99 Romero, who relies upon
the Zionist occupied Pentagon for funding, had suddenly
flip-flopped and joined the "melted steel" theorists.
There is more than just my own common sense and Romero's expert
opinion to support the belief that the towers were imploded from
within. Several witnesses and survivors reported hearing bombs
going off inside the World Trade Center. Louie Cacchioli is a
firefighter with Engine 47 in Harlem, New York. Cacchioli told
People Magazine the following:
"I was taking firefighters up in the elevator to the 24th
floor to get in position to evacuate workers. On the last trip up
a bomb went off. We think there were bombs set in the
building." 100
Now this whole controversy between the "melted steel"
scenario and the detonation scenario is one that could be very
easily resolved. All we have to do is dig up the steel beams and
examine each and everyone of them. If an explosive device caused
the steel to fail, there will be tell-tale indications for the
engineers to see. But if it was intense heat that caused the
steel to "melt" or "buckle", there will be
tell-tale signs of that as well. All we have to do to put an end
to this controversy is to closely examine the steel. Right?
Well, don't hold your breath. That's never going to happen.
Thanks in large part to Time Magazine's "Man of the Year
2001", New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, the steel beams were
quickly recycled before investigators even had the chance to look
at them! A media darling and lifelong supporter of Israel, Saint
Rudy Giuliani made sure that the "smoking gun" evidence
was destroyed and right quick too. Much of the steel was recycled
in America, but an additional seventy thousand tons of WTC steel
was sold to Metals Management - a New York company with a jewish
(Zionist?) president named Alan Ratner. Ratner then turned around
and shipped the WTCs steel to China and India for
recycling! 101
China Radio Internationals English Edition also
reported:
"New York's Metals Management is among the firms taking
steel from the huge project to clear Ground Zero. The company
says it has bought 70,000 tons of scrap from the ruined twin
towers. Some of the scrap has been shipped across the Pacific to
Asian, including China and India. Among the consignments of scrap
are the "very dense" steel girders from Ground Zero,
which could finally yield 250,000 to 400,000 tons of
scrap for recycling." 102
Imaine that! The largest criminal investigation in history and
the investigators weren't even permitted to see the most
important evidence of all - the steel! During the time that Saint
Rudy and Ratner the Recycler were destroying evidence, many of
the most respected engineers in the country complained not only
about the recycling, but also about the Federal government's
suffocating control of their investigation. On December 25, 2001,
the New York Times ran a story about the frustrations of some of
the engineers who were called in to study the cause of the
collapse:
"Interviews with a handful of members of the team, which
includes some of the nation's most respected engineers, also
uncovered complaints that they had at various times been shackled
with bureaucratic restrictions that prevented them
from interviewing witnesses, examining the disaster site and
requesting crucial information like recorded
distress calls to the police and fire
departments..." 103 (emphasis added)
They made their concerns known publicly. Bill Manning, editor of
the 125 year old Fire Engineering magazine, noticed a strange
difference between the WTC investigation and other major fire
investigations in New York Citys history. Manning wrote:
"Did they throw away the locked doors from the Triangle
Shirtwaist fire? Did they throw away the gas can used at the
happy land social club fire?...That's what they're doing at the
World Trade Center. The destruction and removal of evidence must
stop immediately." 104
One investigator told the New York Times:
"This is almost the dream team of engineers in the
country working on this, and our hands are tied," said one
team member who asked not to be identified. Members have been
threatened with dismissal for speaking to the press. "FEMA
is controlling everything," the team member said. " 105
Dr. Frederick W. Mowrer from the Fire Engineering department at
the University of Maryland told the New York Times:
"I find the speed with which important evidence has been
removed and recycled to be appalling." 106
Finally, the Times story made this interesting little revelation
about St. Rudy the Recycler:
"Officials in the mayor's office declined to reply to
written and oral requests for comment over a three- day period
about who decided to recycle the steel and the concern that the
decision might be handicapping the investigation.." 107
It is a very odd form of science that the government and some of
its house scientists practice these days. Without a shred of
physical evidence, these modern-day alchemists have been able to
"prove" their theory fire caused the towers to
collapse. This appears to be yet another monstrous lie. Why else
would you destroy the "melted steel"? Ask Rudy.
LEFT; EXPLOSIVES EXPERT VAN ROMERO: "THE COLLAPSE WAS TOO
METHODICAL."
RIGHT: SAINT RUDY THE RECYCLER AT A PRO-ISRAEL RALLY. HE WAS ALSO
NAMED "MAN OF THE YEAR" BY ZIONIST CONTROLLED TIME
MAGAZINE..
GO TO PART 4